Hi,
I am using atlas.ti to support a classic grounded theory approach to analysing interview data. I have started line-by-line open coding, then inserting a comment for each code with the following: "participant's main concern:X, property indicated by incident:Y, category indicated by property:Z".
Now I am going back over my codes to rename each one according to "CATEGORY_ASPECT_DETAIL".
I'm finding that "category indicated by property:Z" within my code comments fits naturally as "CATEGORY_" in the code rename, and that "property indicated by incident:Y" within my code comments fits naturally as "ASPECT_" in the code rename. My question is thus: in keeping with a classic grounded theory approach, for the "participant's main concern:X" within my code comments, would that fit as "_DETAIL" in the code rename, or should I be making an entirely new code ("CATEGORY_ASPECT_DETAIL") purely for participant's main concern?
Thanks!